Hypocracy in action.
Sam: “I’m going to write a big article on Gizmodo about the Facebook creator getting Person of the Year on Time Magazine, and complain how that’s totally irrelevent with the stated intention of getting people to comment all over it. I will use angry language and bad reasoning. I will treat this entire thing as relevent and make it relevent in Gizmodo. I WANT ATTENTION BY DRAWING ATTENTION TO THIS THING!”
Yes, arguing something such as Zuckerburg’s winning Time’s POTY is irrelevent because the reason he shouldn’t have won is relevent is totally idiotic. You just made him important and relevent, thus your argument is now invalid. GOOD JOB HAVE AN INTERNET GOOD DAY SIR.