Like how the Democrat Debate was covered so closely (and I use that term loosely because it’s anything but accurate), but the screw-up that Brownback committed in the Senate over the Immigration bill that flopped was totally and utterly not mentioned. I can’t wait until someone YouTube’s the CSPAN parts where Brownback says, “I vote Yes and support this bill,” during the opening vote, then chooses to change his vote to “No” when the vote swings the opposite way he predicted.
FLIP FLOP
The new writers for blogs4brownback really went downhill. There’s no creativity or dialogue like the old Syphilis person. That Psycheout person lost some edge when two commentors listed out logical points and the best response they got from him was, “this ain’t typin practice, ur comments are like snot hurr hurr.” I got a laugh out of it, really. The ignorance (if it’s serious and not a prank site) of Brownback supporters will be the death of them and Brownback’s Presidential bid.
EDIT: Uh, since blogs are actually the property of the company that allows you to blog, they are not your “personal property.” Maybe the writing is your “intellectual” property, but in no means are you properly quoting the Constitution when you say it applies to your blog. Because if you really supported the Freedom of Speech, you’d let everyone comment for as long as you want. Their contributions would not be inviolate of your intellectual property.
Of course Psycheout didn’t censor anything and did “let everyone comment for as long as you want.” Nice inconsistent use of pronouns by the way.
Psycheout simply requested that long-winded pseudo-intellectual liberal commenters dial it back a bit and stay on topic. Too bad mcclaud pretends to fail to see the difference.
Not aware that I used the word CENSOR anywhere in my post or that implied you censored anyone. I did remark on your comments that you told them you had the ability to ask them to stop because the blog was personal property and the fact that you insulted people straight out instead of, you know, debated with fact.
Anyway, can Psycheout speak for Psycheout, or is Psycheout so used to speaking in second person because he’s derranged?
mcclaud:
1st person: “I”
2nd person: “you”
3rd person: “him/her/it”
So Psycheout was actually speaking in the third person. Like just then.
See Grammatical Person
Next thing you know, you’ll be using the royal “we” as well.
We are not amused, peasant.