In terms of hits and sheer comments sent in an attempt to rally me or whoever to the side of Little Green Footballs. Or deride me for calling them “fucktards.” Or try to tell me I’m wrong about the anti-Muslim thing. Etc.
ABSOLUTE HILARITY! With a side of LOL fries.
I pondered letting comments slide through like I did with the Brownback post, just to see what would happen. But I realized that it’s already going on everywhere else, so why bring more shitloads of comments that will fill up my email box in a heartbeat? So I decided, “I’ll save these comments for another day, when it will be incredibly fun to share the stupidity of people.”
There were a lot of anti-LGF comments, too. In the vein that they apparently think I approve of their cause to bring down the “LGF conspiracy,” or whatever. No, that’s not what I’m saying. My beef with LGF is the claim of being neutral biased when it’s absolutely not unbiased at all. Just as the anti-LGF people are probably equally biased (and their claims of being unbiased would be equally ridiculed).
I am by no way unbiased, but I don’t see a need to be. This is my blog for my sake. I don’t see why everyone thinks that blogs are going to be unbiased, because chances are, they won’t be. They’ll be just as biased – if not more – than I. Everyone’s got an agenda – fact.
It’s amazing what fucktards come out of left or right field to defend websites. Oh Em Gee, Double U Tee Eff, mate? I don’t think that Digg is concerned at all about being an unbiased news source when it allows biased people to submit and rank stories to be front page. Digg is really just a tool, that is caught up in the drama/politics of human tools. Like LGF is a tool to amass fucktards. And the tool of LGF calling the tool of Digg out is, again, the pot calling the kettle black.
Read Full Post »